See evidence this channel is inflated?
Submit your evidence — screenshots of chat replays, viewer/chatter ratios, or known chat-bot accounts — to add to this dossier.
Submit evidence →MODE
snapshot from our database · live mode pulls fresh telemetry off the chat gatewayDatabase snapshotLive mode →
LIVE
Kick ENGAGEMENT AUDIT
Is notoriuspig inflated?
Rustsampled
Live engagement statistics
- Viewers
- 97
- last sample
- Followers
- —
- live · kick api
- Chatters
- 9
- active · 42 unique
- Engagement
LIVE_FEED.kick
STREAM + CHATLIVE_CHAT
STREAM_TIMELINE.kick
LIVEloading session data…
PREVIOUS_STREAMS.kick
LOADING…loading session history…
VERDICT.txt
SUSPICIOUSEngagement in the watchlist range — clear flag for review.
Session-average engagement of 9.8% (mean of 220 samples) on 97 viewers is below the 10% bot floor for kick — a meaningful deficit, but the audience is too small to definitively call it inflated. Watch the channel over more sessions before drawing conclusions.
Methodology: how we measure engagement.
LIVE_FEED.sock
POLLINGLive ticker — sampled every 30s
last update 32s ago
Viewers
97
Active
9
Engagement
9.3%
1 sample captured
What to do next
Looking for the legit ones instead?
We maintain a vetted directory of streamers that have passed the engagement model. Get pre-cleared, brand-safe creators.
Browse the vetted directory →